This is the first of it's family I've seen, collected from a tiny, fishless stream in the Cascades. The three species of this genus all live in the Northwest and are predators that primarily eat stonefly nymphs Merritt R.W., Cummins, K.W., and Berg, M.B. (2019).
Wbranch on Apr 24, 2012April 24th, 2012, 6:49 pm EDT
Since I've never been able to solve the problem as to why the pics I UL to my posts show up only as thumbnail size I have to use this section to show my pics.
This pics are related to the thread about "the dubbing debate2: to spin or loop"
Many of the thoraxes on these nymphs was created with a dubbing loop.
Entoman on Apr 24, 2012April 24th, 2012, 9:19 pm EDT
I like, Matt. Very nice!
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
Wbranch on Apr 25, 2012April 25th, 2012, 3:06 pm EDT
Thanks guys! Jesse I might have pretty nymphs but I no longer nymph for trout, in the traditional sense. Where I fish in the East and when I go to MT in July, there is no need to ever consider nymphing. All those nymphs and about three other fly boxes were tied pretty much just for Great Lakes creeks and steelhead.
I do sometimes trail a little #18 BH on a piece of 5X about 6" long behind my dry in MT.
Wbranch on Jan 10, 2013January 10th, 2013, 1:05 pm EST
Roguerat,
"GREAT looking flies!"
Thank you Sir!
I started tying again on Monday. I reviewed all my Catskill & Montana boxes, well over 4,000 flies, and decided that other than a dozen caddis pupa and some PMD emergers I really don't need to tie any more flies. However I probably will tie another 200 or so by the end of March just to keep busy during the day.