This specimen resembled several others of around the same size and perhaps the same species, which were pretty common in my February sample from the upper Yakima. Unfortunately, I misplaced the specimen before I could get it under a microscope for a definitive ID.
John on Sep 29, 2006September 29th, 2006, 9:38 am EDT
OK, I've always wanted to fish the Wolf, but never made it. Finally went this week. Read up on it; listened to the LaFontaine tape etc... Beautiful river, nice BWO hatch, no fish. Well, two nice sized chub. What's the story on the Wolf?
Did go up to the Hunting. There found several pods of fish (hundreds in a 6 ft circle). Are these my Wolf fish getting it on? If so why such a large pod?
Troutnut on Sep 29, 2006September 29th, 2006, 3:02 pm EDT
I've never fished the Wolf, but it's got a reputation for being a bit like the Namekagon: great river, but without a lot of luck you're likely to walk away swearing the river has nothing but minnows the first dozen times you fish it. I'm sure some here know more about it, though.
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D.
Troutnut and salmonid ecologist
Bflat on Apr 16, 2008April 16th, 2008, 2:49 pm EDT
I fished the Wolf a lot in the 90's. It's the kind of river that's just on sometimes, and unaccountably off, others. Sometimes I'd have a great day, go again the next day under similar conditions and get skunked. The trout density is lower than the river looks like it should have. So lots of the fishy looking spots are void of trout. Solution: cover a lot of water, quickly. The Wolf suffers from high temperatures. I've heard it has not been fishing well in recent years. It's one of those rare midwestern streams that looks like a western freestone stream. Therein lies it's attraction, I think. Don't overlook the Wolf's smallmouths.