Header image
Enter a name
Lateral view of a Male Baetis (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Dun from Mystery Creek #43 in New York
Blue-winged Olives
Baetis

Tiny Baetis mayflies are perhaps the most commonly encountered and imitated by anglers on all American trout streams due to their great abundance, widespread distribution, and trout-friendly emergence habits.

Dorsal view of a Kogotus (Perlodidae) Stonefly Nymph from Mystery Creek #199 in Washington
This one pretty clearly keys to Kogotus, but it also looks fairly different from specimens I caught in the same creek about a month later in the year. With only one species of the genus known in Washington, I'm not sure about the answer to this ID.
27" brown trout, my largest ever. It was the sub-dominant fish in its pool. After this, I hooked the bigger one, but I couldn't land it.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or support the project for an enhanced experience here.

This topic is about the Mayfly Genus Caudatella

This Western genus is unimportant, but Caudatella heterocaudata and Caudatella hystrix are said to sometimes produce fishable hatches.

Example specimens

Konchu
Konchu's profile picture
Site Editor
Indiana

Posts: 498
Konchu on Oct 29, 2010October 29th, 2010, 1:36 pm EDT
The paper is in press now, so I can share an updated taxonomic synopsis of the "unimportant" genus Caudatella. Have fun.


Caudatella edmundsi (Allen, 1959)

Caudatella columbiella (McDunnough, 1935), comb. n.
= Ephemerella californica Allen and Edmunds, 1961, stat. n., syn. n.

Caudatella heterocaudata (McDunnough, 1929)
= Ephemerella circia Allen and Edmunds, 1961, stat. n., syn. n.

Caudatella hystrix (Traver, 1934)
= Ephemerella spinosa Mayo, 1952
= Ephemerella cascadia Allen and Edmunds, 1961

Caudatella jacobi (McDunnough, 1939)
= Ephemerella orestes Allen and Edmunds, 1961
Taxon
Taxon's profile picture
Site Editor
Plano, TX

Posts: 1311
Taxon on Oct 29, 2010October 29th, 2010, 3:18 pm EDT
Luke-

From your posting, it appears that what was previously Caudatella heterocaudata and its (3) subspecies are now Caudatella heterocaudata (with no subspecies), and (new species), Caudatella columbiella. Is that correct?
Best regards,
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
Konchu
Konchu's profile picture
Site Editor
Indiana

Posts: 498
Konchu on Oct 30, 2010October 30th, 2010, 2:48 am EDT
columbiella was an old species that was synonymized with heterocaudata; i think it is a separate species

circia, californica and heterocaudata were all subspecies of heterocaudata

it turns out that californica is the same thing as columbiella

circia does not hold up as a nominal entity under most current philosophies. at the time it was described, the authors acknowledged that it probably interbred with other variants of heterocaudata, and the defining characters varied even in the population at the type locale. so, it should be considered the same species as heterocaudata
Taxon
Taxon's profile picture
Site Editor
Plano, TX

Posts: 1311
Taxon on Oct 30, 2010October 30th, 2010, 10:42 am EDT
Thanks, Luke.
Best regards,
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com

Quick Reply

Related Discussions

7
Oct 4, 2008
by GONZO
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 (email Jason). privacy policy