interesting, all of it, guys!thanks!
WBranch, that is the perfect example of confidence in a fly. it was in the West that i learned about these, and seldom do i get any takes on my PA streams. too much woods, i think--hoppers live in pastures.
RLeeP, i, too do not tie my own parachute hoppers. the Letort style is as far as i'll go, and usually i just tie them in black for crickets. thanks for the ideas for "legs."
TNEAL, thanks for the pattern offer. i've had luck with a Thunder Creek-style head, but they don't come out very fat. look for a PM :)
JMD123, that's a nifty approach to a Joe's Hopper. thanks for a new use for the big packet of red goose quills lurking somewhere in the vast stash of materials that is called my office.
your replies are all just great--thanks for taking the time and confirming my suspicions that the best hopper anglers use something approaching The Real Deal.
now, to be truthful, i carry those foam obscenities when fishing out west, and had an opportunity to actually use them last summer. there were 4 or 5 different rubber patterns in my box, and no parachutes. i was fishing a little bitty headwater where the cutthroats can be very entertaining. conditions were typical August: low water and not a lot of action. after a bit i found a likely pool at a confluence. those fish rose to absolutely every pattern i had!
i think there were about a dozen fish in there, all 10-12 inches, and almost every single one made it to the net. if things slowed down, i changed rubber hoppers, and away we went again. poor hungry devils! i lost as many to mashed barbs as i landed, hence my estimate of the population: a new fly would attract any which had released long distance, i figured.
Cutthroats in little far-away streams are easy, so i'm still going to stick with parachutes for actual fishing, though.