So, do they say "masquinonge" in Wisconsin?
There are a number of different spellings and pronunciations for the muskellunge (
Esox masquinongy) but very seldom is it referred to as any thing other than muskie or musky if you prefer. However, when referring to the muskellunge in the printed word and spelling it as “musky” you may be called out by some who are opposed to the odoriferous connotation. I don’t know why, because they do have a distinct “stinkiness” if you will.
And, have you ever caught one of those beasts on a fly rod?
I started fishing muskie at a very early age because it was my dad’s favorite sport. I have no idea how many I’ve caught over the years but my biggest is 45 inches caught back in the early 80’s. Although that is still considered a nice catch it’s short by today’s standard. If it isn’t 50+ inches it’s considered just another fish. I pretty much gave it up in favor of trout fishing and never really returned, so to answer your question, no I’ve never caught one on a fly rod, but that is catching on quite quickly these days.
Calling a muskie a beast, to some, may be an understatement. That large mouth full of long sharp teeth coupled with a 12 inch lure full of nasty treble hooks can reek havoc to ones flesh. Back in my early days a tackle box wasn’t complete without a hand gun and ammunition. I kid you not; the larger fish were brought along side the boat and shot in the head before being boated. I could tell you some stories which would explain why the practice was outlawed.
Enough of my
Musky tale, lets get back to trout.