Blue-winged Olives
Baetis
Tiny Baetis mayflies are perhaps the most commonly encountered and imitated by anglers on all American trout streams due to their great abundance, widespread distribution, and trout-friendly emergence habits.
Featured on the forum
This specimen keys pretty easily to Onocosmoecus, and it closely resembles a specimen from Alaska which caddis expert Dave Ruiter recognized as this genus. As with that specimen, the only species in the genus documented in this area is Onocosmoecus unicolor, but Dave suggested for that specimen that there might be multiple not-yet-distinguished species under the unicolor umbrella and it would be best to stick with the genus-level ID. I'm doing the same for this one.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and
fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or
support the project for an enhanced experience here.
Planettrout on Oct 13, 2014October 13th, 2014, 8:50 am EDT
UV materials...not sure where to buy flies with UV material... don't recall any of the stores (Orvis, fly shops etc) setting aside flies . I would like to try one, but don't know where to find them ... any thoughts? If the trout are saying yes, so will I. :)
Ted,
Spirit River offers a number of UV2 patterns, in bulk, to dealers :
https://spiritriver.com/flies/uv2-flies
Nice photo of the Upper Owens River on yer' site... :)
PT/TB
Daughter to Father: "How many arms do you have, how many fly rods do you need?"
http://planettrout.wordpress.com/
http://planettrout.wordpress.com/
DanielDHolm
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
DanielDHolm on Dec 5, 2014December 5th, 2014, 12:53 am EST
Hi there. It seems to me that there is great confusion on the terms Uv and fluorescence.
I have made the following video about what is what and how it works.
Just Copy/past the link to your browser it will be worth it ;)
I have made the following video about what is what and how it works.
Just Copy/past the link to your browser it will be worth it ;)
PaulRoberts on Dec 6, 2014December 6th, 2014, 5:08 pm EST
Hi Daniel, nicely done video.
As to UV and trout vision, I'm not equipped to talk about it, yet. I'm not convinced that there's enough work done to really understand the periodicity or function of UV sensitivity in adult trout yet.
I am well aware that there is some excitement surrounding UV materials for trout flies but whether that excitement is being emphasized by exclamation points from anglers or dollar signs from entrepreneurs I don't know. Color is a particularly tough nut to crack from the anglers perspective, angling being a poor sampling technique in general.
There are also some entrepreneurs marketing UV materials in the bass fishing world too, even though bass have not been shown to possess UV sensitivity as yet, (much less it's possible periodicity and function). One company's video demonstration "proving" that bass can see UV is the shining of a "UV flashlight" beam into an aquarium containing of bass, and the bass chase the light's motion. But, as you demonstrate in your video, the bass are likely responding to the visible light bleed that exists in "corner store" UV flashlights.
Which reminds me of a story, told by Bill McFarland during a lecture on the evolution of color vision in fish: A headstrong graduate student prematurely purchased some colored filters for the projection system they were using to emit various wavelengths of light to fish. It had never occurred to her that the filters she chose might look “red” or “blue” to us, but not be accurate enough to collect only the proper wavelengths of interest. Her results were worthless.
As to UV and trout vision, I'm not equipped to talk about it, yet. I'm not convinced that there's enough work done to really understand the periodicity or function of UV sensitivity in adult trout yet.
I am well aware that there is some excitement surrounding UV materials for trout flies but whether that excitement is being emphasized by exclamation points from anglers or dollar signs from entrepreneurs I don't know. Color is a particularly tough nut to crack from the anglers perspective, angling being a poor sampling technique in general.
There are also some entrepreneurs marketing UV materials in the bass fishing world too, even though bass have not been shown to possess UV sensitivity as yet, (much less it's possible periodicity and function). One company's video demonstration "proving" that bass can see UV is the shining of a "UV flashlight" beam into an aquarium containing of bass, and the bass chase the light's motion. But, as you demonstrate in your video, the bass are likely responding to the visible light bleed that exists in "corner store" UV flashlights.
Which reminds me of a story, told by Bill McFarland during a lecture on the evolution of color vision in fish: A headstrong graduate student prematurely purchased some colored filters for the projection system they were using to emit various wavelengths of light to fish. It had never occurred to her that the filters she chose might look “red” or “blue” to us, but not be accurate enough to collect only the proper wavelengths of interest. Her results were worthless.
Martinlf on Dec 7, 2014December 7th, 2014, 9:33 am EST
but whether that excitement is being emphasized by exclamation points from anglers or dollar signs from entrepreneurs I don't know.
I'll second Paul's observation, though I've been experimenting with both the UV2 materials and some fluorescent materials, and like the results so far. However there is no way as far as I can tell to know for sure whether or not they actually made a difference.
It appears that trout take a fly for many different reasons, sometimes because it seems to match something they have been eating, sometimes just sampling because it might be food, and for other reasons, such as defending territory, or striking in a kill impulse.
And many tiers choose materials for many different reasons. Some like all natural materials, others prefer synthetics. Some want realistic flies, others prefer impressionistic, and many don't care as long as they catch fish. I've long since accepted that some of what I do when tying some of my flies is more for me than for the trout. But as long as I'm having fun and the trout are responding, it's all good.
I'd love to see some well-designed scientific studies on trout responses to both UV materials and fluorescent materials. However, I can't imagine who would fund them.
"He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'"
--Fred Chappell
--Fred Chappell
PaulRoberts on Dec 7, 2014December 7th, 2014, 3:23 pm EST
I'll second Paul's observation, though I've been experimenting with both the UV2 materials and some fluorescent materials, and like the results so far. However there is no way as far as I can tell to know for sure whether or not they actually made a difference.
It appears that trout take a fly for many different reasons, sometimes because it seems to match something they have been eating, sometimes just sampling because it might be food, and for other reasons, such as defending territory, or striking in a kill impulse.
And many tiers choose materials for many different reasons. Some like all natural materials, others prefer synthetics. Some want realistic flies, others prefer impressionistic, and many don't care as long as they catch fish. I've long since accepted that some of what I do when tying some of my flies is more for me than for the trout. But as long as I'm having fun and the trout are responding, it's all good.
I'd love to see some well-designed scientific studies on trout responses to both UV materials and fluorescent materials. However, I can't imagine who would fund them.
In general, I’m a stiff skeptic when it comes to color. Almost a stick in the mud. This isn’t to be a jerk, but, as a predator, I’m a bit of a control freak. I’m sensitive to falling for “superstition”. I’ve fished a long time (and done research) and seen so many theories crumble –in angling, especially ones surrounding color. I’ve even collected stories and anecdotes that expose such foolery. Let’s just say, I don’t believe everything I believe. Thus, I don’t believe everything others say they believe. Solid evidence is tough to come by, subject to interpretation and speculation.
This doesn’t mean I’m closed to UV having a potential role in trout vision. Visibility is an important factor and that’s where the majority of the magic lies in fluorescents, I think. UV may play a role there, at certain times. Reed suggests that there are search image possibilities too. It’s a good theory, and one far from unprecedented in insectivores (and frugivores).
Likely the interactions between UV, materials, and trout vision will need to pieced together from research for other purposes. Just like we've done for other colors for a long time now. And look where it's got us. :) In the fishing world, color theories, like moon phase theories, abound, and abound in stunning contradiction. Human's have been dubbed -from other research fields- "belief machines". True understanding takes open-mindedness, training, and discipline. Otherwise, we're left with superstition, which has served admirably across evolutionary time, so far. Enough to catch plenty of fish. :)
Entoman on Dec 7, 2014December 7th, 2014, 9:33 pm EST
Frustrating!!!
Again for the umpteenth time in this thread... The materials marketed as "UV" have nothing to do with alleged salmonid UV vision. These are fluorescent materials that absorb UV to emit in the blue spectrum even though the base color may be different, like red for example. An interesting trait to be sure, but still just fluorescence. While trouts ability to see in UV and the significance of this to feeding behavior is worth discussing, confusing posts lacking a clear understanding of what's being discussed are...
IF visible (to the fish) UV is truly a trigger the trout are looking for, these are the last materials one would use as they are not reflecting any UV! It's being absorbed and converted for lack of a better word to visible light.
Materials that reflect only UV will appear black to us, not blue. Materials that do reflect varying amounts of UV may prove useful, but they won't have to glow blue... The originator of this thread has done some interesting work in this area and I hope that he revisits to help clear up the confusion. I don't blaim Trounut posters for being misled, but I am a little miffed at those mislabeling and hyping to sell stuff.
Not in my usual diplomatic mood tonight. :)
Again for the umpteenth time in this thread... The materials marketed as "UV" have nothing to do with alleged salmonid UV vision. These are fluorescent materials that absorb UV to emit in the blue spectrum even though the base color may be different, like red for example. An interesting trait to be sure, but still just fluorescence. While trouts ability to see in UV and the significance of this to feeding behavior is worth discussing, confusing posts lacking a clear understanding of what's being discussed are...
IF visible (to the fish) UV is truly a trigger the trout are looking for, these are the last materials one would use as they are not reflecting any UV! It's being absorbed and converted for lack of a better word to visible light.
Materials that reflect only UV will appear black to us, not blue. Materials that do reflect varying amounts of UV may prove useful, but they won't have to glow blue... The originator of this thread has done some interesting work in this area and I hope that he revisits to help clear up the confusion. I don't blaim Trounut posters for being misled, but I am a little miffed at those mislabeling and hyping to sell stuff.
Not in my usual diplomatic mood tonight. :)
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
Crepuscular on Dec 8, 2014December 8th, 2014, 3:02 am EST
Frustrating!!!
Again for the umpteenth time in this thread...
I was waiting for this...hehe
Oldredbarn on Dec 8, 2014December 8th, 2014, 10:18 am EST
In general, I’m a stiff skeptic when it comes to color. Almost a stick in the mud. This isn’t to be a jerk, but, as a predator, I’m a bit of a control freak. I’m sensitive to falling for “superstition”. I’ve fished a long time (and done research) and seen so many theories crumble –in angling, especially ones surrounding color. I’ve even collected stories and anecdotes that expose such foolery. Let’s just say, I don’t believe everything I believe. Thus, I don’t believe everything others say they believe. Solid evidence is tough to come by, subject to interpretation and speculation.
Nicely put Paul. What was it they said about the emperor's clothing?
Spence
"Even when my best efforts fail it's a satisfying challenge, and that, after all, is the essence of fly fishing." -Chauncy Lively
"Envy not the man who lives beside the river, but the man the river flows through." Joseph T Heywood
"Envy not the man who lives beside the river, but the man the river flows through." Joseph T Heywood
DanielDHolm
Posts: 2
Posts: 2
DanielDHolm on Dec 8, 2014December 8th, 2014, 9:35 pm EST
Thank you Poul
I know that nothing is curtain regarding fish vision.
I am just saying that when something sound too good to be true, is invisible, and cost twice the amount of all other regular stuff, I get suspicious. If it cost the same, I say go for it, it can at worst it don’t have any effect ;)
I know that nothing is curtain regarding fish vision.
I am just saying that when something sound too good to be true, is invisible, and cost twice the amount of all other regular stuff, I get suspicious. If it cost the same, I say go for it, it can at worst it don’t have any effect ;)
Wbranch on Dec 9, 2014December 9th, 2014, 1:21 am EST
Wow, five pages of posts on a material that I've only heard of this year for the first time and have no interest in adding to my collection of fly tying material.
We fly tiers are all so very fortunate for all the new materials that have found there way from other commercial sectors to be used for fly tying. I think we already have many advantages in our flies that were unheard of twenty-five years ago. How easy do we have to make it for ourselves? Let's give the trout a break and utilize the skills we develop with the materials we have now rather than developing more materials to make it even easier to catch a trout.
We fly tiers are all so very fortunate for all the new materials that have found there way from other commercial sectors to be used for fly tying. I think we already have many advantages in our flies that were unheard of twenty-five years ago. How easy do we have to make it for ourselves? Let's give the trout a break and utilize the skills we develop with the materials we have now rather than developing more materials to make it even easier to catch a trout.
Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years.
Oldredbarn on Dec 9, 2014December 9th, 2014, 11:58 am EST
Let's give the trout a break and utilize the skills we develop with the materials we have now rather than developing more materials to make it even easier to catch a trout.
Wow! Matt. How well put?!
Really. What is it we are trying to do here? Learn to cast for christsakes! Learn some skills.
Thanks!
Spence
"Even when my best efforts fail it's a satisfying challenge, and that, after all, is the essence of fly fishing." -Chauncy Lively
"Envy not the man who lives beside the river, but the man the river flows through." Joseph T Heywood
"Envy not the man who lives beside the river, but the man the river flows through." Joseph T Heywood
Wbranch on Dec 9, 2014December 9th, 2014, 3:36 pm EST
Learn to cast for christsakes! Learn some skills.
Yes, learn effective line management skills, learn what a slack line cast is and how to perform it and lengthen your float with it. With a little wiggle here and another wiggle there I can get a 30' drag free float. Learn how to hit a target within 2" to the left or right of a rise form on the first cast. Stop false casting endlessly. Put the damn fly on the water. When I see guys false casting endlessly and barely lengthening their cast I want to shout at them - "throw the freaking cast already".
Sometimes I do false cast repeatedly but it is not to dry the fly or to lengthen the cast. If I see a fish rise I try and see what the frequency of the riseform is and then false cast until I have figured it is about time for the fish to rise again. Unless a trout is suspended just an inch or two below the surface as soon as he rises up from the depths he drops down again almost immediately. So if you happen to drop your fly as he is going back down 3' - 4' he isn't going to see the fly.
Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years.
PaulRoberts on Dec 9, 2014December 9th, 2014, 4:13 pm EST
Frustrating!!!
Again for the umpteenth time in this thread... The materials marketed as "UV" have nothing to do with alleged salmonid UV vision. These are fluorescent materials that absorb UV to emit in the blue spectrum even though the base color may be different, like red for example. An interesting trait to be sure, but still just fluorescence. While trouts ability to see in UV and the significance of this to feeding behavior is worth discussing, confusing posts lacking a clear understanding of what's being discussed are...
IF visible (to the fish) UV is truly a trigger the trout are looking for, these are the last materials one would use as they are not reflecting any UV! It's being absorbed and converted for lack of a better word to visible light.
Materials that reflect only UV will appear black to us, not blue. Materials that do reflect varying amounts of UV may prove useful, but they won't have to glow blue... The originator of this thread has done some interesting work in this area and I hope that he revisits to help clear up the confusion. I don't blaim Trounut posters for being misled, but I am a little miffed at those mislabeling and hyping to sell stuff.
Not in my usual diplomatic mood tonight. :)
Oh yeah! :) I'm interested in trout (and bass) visual capabilities, so that's where I'm focused. Apologies for perpetuating this UV materials myth.
Lastchance on Dec 10, 2014December 10th, 2014, 9:11 am EST
I use UV material to tie my sulfurs.
Martinlf on Mar 15, 2015March 15th, 2015, 6:49 pm EDT
Bumping this one up for Bob. We've been discussing related topics via PM's and thought this would supplement the discussion.
"He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'"
--Fred Chappell
--Fred Chappell
Overmywader
Posts: 31
Posts: 31
Overmywader on Mar 16, 2015March 16th, 2015, 9:28 am EDT
Wow, this thread is back again.
As I've said often, we are always tying with UV-reflective material, because everything reflects at least some tiny percentage of available UV light. Iridescent materials, e.g., peacock herl, don't reflect much (nor are they iridescent under water). Some fluorescent materials also are highly UV reflective; some aren't.
A recent study showed how important UV-reflective markings can be to trout. The study used three-spined sticklebacks - Gasterosteus aculeatus - as a prey species. They determined that the stickleback 'minnows' were attacked more often by their predator if the natural UV-markings of the sticklebacks were visible. The predators were yearling brown trout, 7-9" in length. A fascinating study. see http://www.actazool.org/temp/%7B8FAC0D77-C93C-4CF9-94DF-757BF3A0F365%7D.pdf
In summary, "The difference in attack probability corresponded to the difference in chromatic contrasts between sticklebacks and the experimental background calculated for both the UV+ and UV- conditions in a physiological model of trout colour vision. UV reflections seem to be costly by enhancing the risk of predation due to an increased conspicuousness of prey. This is the first study in a vertebrate, to our knowledge, demonstrating direct predation risk due to UV wavelengths."
BTW, I wrote a short article on UV vision in trout, see http://www.overmywaders.com/cblog/index.php?/archives/112-Ultraviolet-Vision-in-Trout.html
As I've said often, we are always tying with UV-reflective material, because everything reflects at least some tiny percentage of available UV light. Iridescent materials, e.g., peacock herl, don't reflect much (nor are they iridescent under water). Some fluorescent materials also are highly UV reflective; some aren't.
A recent study showed how important UV-reflective markings can be to trout. The study used three-spined sticklebacks - Gasterosteus aculeatus - as a prey species. They determined that the stickleback 'minnows' were attacked more often by their predator if the natural UV-markings of the sticklebacks were visible. The predators were yearling brown trout, 7-9" in length. A fascinating study. see http://www.actazool.org/temp/%7B8FAC0D77-C93C-4CF9-94DF-757BF3A0F365%7D.pdf
In summary, "The difference in attack probability corresponded to the difference in chromatic contrasts between sticklebacks and the experimental background calculated for both the UV+ and UV- conditions in a physiological model of trout colour vision. UV reflections seem to be costly by enhancing the risk of predation due to an increased conspicuousness of prey. This is the first study in a vertebrate, to our knowledge, demonstrating direct predation risk due to UV wavelengths."
BTW, I wrote a short article on UV vision in trout, see http://www.overmywaders.com/cblog/index.php?/archives/112-Ultraviolet-Vision-in-Trout.html
PaulRoberts on Mar 16, 2015March 16th, 2015, 4:08 pm EDT
Thanks for that Reed. The link fails but one is able to view the cache.
Martinlf on Jun 11, 2020June 11th, 2020, 9:08 am EDT
Here's another UV thread.
"He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'"
--Fred Chappell
--Fred Chappell
Wbranch on Dec 9, 2020December 9th, 2020, 11:43 am EST
I fish often and catch a good number of large trout. I've never used UV materials purposely to enhance my fish catching. Maybe they can improve catch rates but I won't be tying any.
Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years.
Quick Reply
Related Discussions
Topic
Replies
Last Reply
5
Aug 20, 2009
by Flytyer0423
by Flytyer0423
1
Jul 11, 2008
by Taxon
by Taxon
13
Mar 30, 2021
by Taxon
by Taxon
30
Jan 13, 2015
by Captaincon
by Captaincon
8
Nov 5, 2020
by Stickstring
by Stickstring