Updates from April 23, 2022

This specimen represents a common find in a late-April sample from the far upper Yakima River. It seems to be the same species as another one I collected previously. Of the species keyed in Szczytko & Stewart 1979, it probably matches Isoperla fusca closest, but there's a good chance it's a species that wasn't in the key. The leg segments have a fringe of fine hairs which is supposed to be absent in Isoperla fusca, and the four dark stripes of the mesonotum and metanotum don't continue as 4 separate stripes on the pronotum as they should in the description of fusca. It's possible fusca is more variable than previously described, or this is a different species not included in that key. It's also worth noting there's definitely no fringe of fine setae on any part of the cerci, just the whorls of little stout ones around segment bases.

This is a difficult one. It keys convincingly to either Calineuria or Doroneuria. There is no mesal longitudinal row of silky hairs on thorax and abdominal dorsum, in either my pictures or anything I can see up close under the microscope. Lacking those hairs should indicate Calineuria. But abdominal sternum 7 has an incomplete posterior setal fringe, which would indicate Doroneuria, although the key says "usually" on that characteristic. For now I'm going with Calineuria, but it's far from certain. Maybe it's a younger Doroneuria and they don't grow that row of hairs until they're older. The markings on the head, especially the shape of the bright spot around the posterior ocelli, match online images of Calineuria californica better than Doroneuria.

This one took an embarrassingly long time to identify, because the key I was following sent me on a wild goose chase when I interpreted the longitudinal dorsal stripe on the abdomen of this specimen as a "longitudinal pigment band." I've updated the key text on this site so that mistake isn't so easy for others to make.

I'm tentatively calling this specimen Rhithrogena virilis, based on the incomplete key in The Biology of Mayflies which describes the correct body length (12 mm) and a purplish tinge on the dorsal half of the platelike gills. An early specimen posted by Bob Newell describes markings on the last couple abdominal tergites which also match this nymph.