Header image
Enter a name
Artistic view of a Male Pteronarcys californica (Pteronarcyidae) (Giant Salmonfly) Stonefly Adult from the Gallatin River in Montana
Salmonflies
Pteronarcys californica

The giant Salmonflies of the Western mountains are legendary for their proclivity to elicit consistent dry-fly action and ferocious strikes.

Dorsal view of a Skwala (Perlodidae) (Large Springfly) Stonefly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
This Skwala nymph still has a couple months left to go before hatching, but it's still a good representative of its species, which was extremely abundant in my sample for a stonefly of this size. It's obvious why the Yakima is known for its Skwala hatch.
27" brown trout, my largest ever. It was the sub-dominant fish in its pool. After this, I hooked the bigger one, but I couldn't land it.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or support the project for an enhanced experience here.

Bflat
central wisconsin

Posts: 7
Bflat on Apr 16, 2008April 16th, 2008, 4:09 pm EDT
Modern rods are so good that I'd venture to guess that even the cheapest discount store rod is better than the best rod of yesteryear. I like fine tackle, but never fool myself into thinking it's really necessary. I remember expressing my interest in bamboo to an old and accomplished fisherman. His response, "When glass rods came out we were so relieved to give up our bamboo rods and their upkeep, then came graphite, what a pleasure."
I'm still fascinated with bamboo, but think they're somewhat (not totally) an affectation.

High end rods quickly reach a level of "diminishing returns." They are pretty cool, though.

A nice thing about trout fishing is that even the most expensive stuff is cheap relative to other pursuits, such as sport flying, horses, car collecting, etc.. Heck, just compare high end waders to a bass boat! Or flies to plugs.

Bob
Bflat
TheMidge
Massachusetts

Posts: 16
TheMidge on Apr 30, 2008April 30th, 2008, 10:50 am EDT
I have to way in here. I began fly fishing with an inexpensive rod from LL Beans (the quest) as I became a better caster, I purchased a TFO 3 weight, and saw a difference...... I really liked it. Next I bought an Elkhorn, and emmediately saw an improvment. The rod just casted better and felt more "quality" for the same price. I was a firm believer in never paying big money for a rod. Over the winter, I bought a discontinued Sage XP at LL Beans factory outlet for under $200 because I figured worse case scenario, I could turn a small profit on it. This rod allows me to do things I could never do with my other rods. It is more responsive when nymphing, it is a 5 wt that lays down line softer than my 3 wt, I can cast much farther with accuracy, and it can handle streamers and double nymph rigs that my other 5 wt's had trouble with. Will I spend $600 on a rod? No way. Will I bargain hunt for my next rod? absolutely.
Georges
Central MA

Posts: 5
Georges on Jun 20, 2008June 20th, 2008, 6:11 am EDT
Interesting thread and I've got to say that if I were buying rods today I would be buying in the, "cheap" range because at 73 and retired, I still have a 17 and 12 year old to get through college. Besides, I do have a number of high end rods that I continue to use and I can attest to a better casting experience with them than with some of my cheaper rods. However, all of my rods (and reels)were purchased on sale or closeouts prior to the "boom" in flyfishing. When I started in 1948 and pretty much through the 70's, tackle and materials were relativey inexpensive. For example, in 1970 I purchased an Orvis, "Midge" rod (bamboo 7 1/2' 5wt) and an Orvis Batenkill, 8' 6wt, at $90.00 (for both rods) during a closeout at a well know firearms store near Rochester NY. During the same time frame I picked up 2 Leonards (Tournament and Duracane)for cheap money at another store failure and a third Leonard at a TU banquet auction.So, in the main, I suppose the purchases would be eBay "like" in cost.

Although I have and enjoy the bamboo, the rods I use most today are 5 Loomis graphite rods that I built in 1981. I was contemplating buying a shop on the East Branch and Loomis had a package of 5 blanks for $17 each as a promotional package. I chose a 3,4,5,6,7, all 9' except the 3 which is 8 1/2' (it is really a lovely rod). Each rod built out cost less than $30. If I were in the market for a new rod today there is no question that a blank is the route I would take. Many people who have rods with the latest graphite technology cast these rods and without exception they are amazed the feel of these older rods.

So my advise is to look at discontinued blanks from manufacturers or dealers and I know that you can build a top end rod for less than Cabela's, Bass Pro, whomever. Besides, like catching a trout/fish on your own tie, the same feeling carries over to a rod that you built.

I'm sorry for the length and stuff on the bamboos. I intended for this note to focus on getting a top quality rod for little money and since most here take pride in their tying, it seems logical to take the next step and build your rod. It's easy and there is a huge amount of info available today to help you through the process.
Teddyp
North Carolina

Posts: 18
Teddyp on Jun 20, 2008June 20th, 2008, 7:01 am EDT
I am so glad to read these posts about rods. I bought a new TFO 8'0 4wt when my old Fenwick needed to be retired and love it. The shop I bought it from had a pond to cast them in and I threw a Winston and an Orvis and couldn't really feel the difference. I'm glad to see others feel the same way!

btw - new to the site but love the forums and info!
Ted

Quick Reply

Related Discussions

Topic
Replies
Last Reply
2
Nov 21, 2018
by Partsman
1
May 10, 2012
by FisherOfMen
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 (email Jason). privacy policy