http://www.flyfishinghistory.com/skues.htm#
that's not fly fishing either. Although, they might like to think so.
Strmanglr,
I think, in my opinion you have basically hit the nail on the head here. "they might like to think so"...
If this question wasn't coming from Allan I would normally say that these sorts of "semantic" type things are posted to either stir the pot, or from someone who wants to "justify" whatever it is they may do, even when it may not truely fit a particular definition. For example, I've been a vegetarian since I was 16 and ever since that time, I would be rich, if I had gathered a buck everytime I heard someone say to me, "Hey. I'm a vegetarian too, but I eat fish, oh and chicken occasionally, and turkey at Thanksgiving of course." You either is or you ain't, but we humans find comfort in our gray areas.
I was a very lucky kid when my grandfather took me in to the woods to hunt as a young child. He taught me a great deal about animal behaviour and gave me a love for the place I still carry with me. He taught me how to do my homework and sometime before opening day figure out where deer trails existed, feeding areas, etc so I could "hunt" when the time came. Sitting in a blind listening to the football game some Saturday taking pot-shots at deer over a bait pile would not of been hunting to him, but harvesting.
I don't want to get anyone's "Tidy-Whities" in a knot here, I am only stating my opinion. I really don't care personally what anyone else does or believes...I think the history of our sport is pretty much traced back to the chaulk streams of England and I believe that "fly-fishing" is done with a rod that has evolved from those early days that was designed to deliver an imitation of a fly which I take to mean "insecta".
When I fished my old Michigan Big-Uglies or if I were to construct a "lure" (I know that this term is taken as a perjorative, but here I mean lure in the old English sense as something other than a "fly") from those Fish-Skulls I would not call it fly-fishing but "Streamer" fishing. The tools involved may look like I was fly fishing, but to me I am not.
When I fished the Pere Marquette this last September for salmon (my post is still there) I used a 10' 8wt fly rod and there was a "slinky" rig at the terminal end with a weight and two flies...Well the stonefly nymph was a fly, the egg pattern was not. The rod was not used as a "fly" rod but a delivery device...It was a variation of "chuck-and-duck"...There was absolutely no false casting involved. The line was running line and not even fly-line.
In Michigan we have had an on-going discussion over what might be called "gear-restricted" streams &/or flies-only stretches...The only thing that is actually "restricted" is the fly on the terminal end. So, a guy can walk down the middle of the Holy Water on the Au Sable with a spinning rig and as long as whatever is hanging from the end is a "fly" it's ok.
I remember years ago an old-timer that had a cabin near where I fished within the Holy Water. He did just as I said above and walked down the middle of the stream with a large/feathered monstrousity hanging from the end of his spinning outfit...He would say to me something along the lines of, "I've owned my damn cabin since the 30's (this was actually a lie, but whatever) and I can damn well do as I please here. Those rules don't apply to me. I'm grandfathered!" (Hey Strmanglr. I don't know where it is here, but you might enjoy my story, which I know I told on this site, from when this same old-timer took a shot at me with a pistol...He missed...Claimed he was shooting at squirrels...Another activity that though illegal he thought he could do anyway..."Them rules just don't apply to me!" He was pretty damn old. I haven't seem him in at least 15 years or so. He's probably poaching on a stream somewhere in Purgatorio...;)
I think that's how it goes..."A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest" (P Simon). We want to claim we are fly fishing when we are actually just using the tools to do as we please and are probably stretching the envelope a bit.
My salmon fishing above took place in a flies-only/catch-and-release section of the PM. I was "legal" not because of the rod in my hand, but because I had what passed, for the state anyway, as a fly on the end of my line...It didn't matter to them that the rig was prone to snagging the fish, or that I was foul-hooking some fish that were supposed to be released.
I know our equipment has evolved and folks use some of the same gear I do to do whatever type of fishing they like to do...But to me fly fishing is limited to flies and the other stuff is just that, something else.
Spence
I want to explain that I'm not passing judgement here what-so-ever...You will have to atone for your own sins, once you are face-to-face with your maker...:) As will I... (that's an emoticon there boys so please don't wet yourselves)...