Header image
Enter a name
Lateral view of a Male Baetis (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Dun from Mystery Creek #43 in New York
Blue-winged Olives
Baetis

Tiny Baetis mayflies are perhaps the most commonly encountered and imitated by anglers on all American trout streams due to their great abundance, widespread distribution, and trout-friendly emergence habits.

Dorsal view of a Limnephilidae (Giant Sedges) Caddisfly Larva from the Yakima River in Washington
This specimen resembled several others of around the same size and perhaps the same species, which were pretty common in my February sample from the upper Yakima. Unfortunately, I misplaced the specimen before I could get it under a microscope for a definitive ID.
27" brown trout, my largest ever. It was the sub-dominant fish in its pool. After this, I hooked the bigger one, but I couldn't land it.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or support the project for an enhanced experience here.

Identification: Key to Species of Drunella Nymphs, Couplet 7

Identification: Key to Species of Drunella Nymphs, Couplet 7

Option 1Option 2
Abdomen without paired dorsal tubercles, but may have paired ridges Abdomen with paired dorsal tubercles, always well-developed on segments 5-7
Head smooth, without paired occipital tubercles (pictured yellow box)
Median ocellar tubercle (red box) and frontoclypeal projections (green boxes)
Median ocellar tubercle (red box) and frontoclypeal projections (green boxes) Figure from this Drunella cornuta nymph.
Head roughened, with paired occipital tubercles, or with small to large paired occipital tubercles
Remaining species: Drunella cornuta, Drunella cornutella, Drunella lata, and Drunella longicornisRemaining species: Drunella allegheniensis, Drunella tuberculata, and Drunella walkeri
3 Example Specimens
Go to Couplet 8 Go to Couplet 10
The current couplet is highlighted with darker colors and a icon, and couplets leading to this point have a icon.
Leads to Couplet 2:
  • Western North American species
Couplet 2
Leads to Couplet 7:
  • Eastern North American species
Couplet 7
Leads to Couplet 3:
  • Abdominal sterna with prominent friction disc of setae
Couplet 3
Leads to Couplet 4:
  • Abdominal sterna without prominent friction disc of setae (although felt-like coating of setae may be present)
Couplet 4
Leads to Drunella doddsii:
  • Forefemur with margins toothed
Leads to Drunella pelosa:
  • Forefemur with margins smooth
Leads to Couplet 5:
  • Forefemur with margins with prominent teeth
  • Prosternum with no anterior projection
Couplet 5
Leads to Couplet 6:
  • Forefemur with margins mostly smooth
  • Prosternum with prominent anterior projection
Couplet 6
Leads to Drunella coloradensis:
  • Abdominal terga with paired, narrow spines
Leads to Drunella flavilinea:
  • Abdominal terga with paired, broadly triangular spines
Leads to Drunella spinifera:
  • Abdominal terga 8 and 9 with paired spines more than twice the length of spines on preceding segments
Leads to Drunella grandis:
  • Abdominal terga 8 and 9 with paired spines clearly less than twice the length of preceding pairs
Couplet 7

You are here
Couplet 7 (You are here)
Leads to Couplet 8:
  • Abdomen without paired dorsal tubercles, but may have paired ridges
  • Head smooth, without paired occipital tubercles (pictured yellow box)
Couplet 8
Leads to Couplet 10:
  • Abdomen with paired dorsal tubercles, always well-developed on segments 5-7
  • Head roughened, with paired occipital tubercles, or with small to large paired occipital tubercles
Couplet 10
Leads to Drunella lata:
  • Frontoclypeal projections are short (approximately as long as their width at the base), not curved, and do not protrude anteriorly from the surface of the frontoclypeus (Funk et al. 2008)
  • Femora with few or no long, fine setae on posterior margin (McCafferty et al 2017)
Leads to Couplet 11:
  • Frontoclypeal projections are about twice as long as wide (extending to anywhere from just before the margin of the frontoclypeus to well beyond it), conical (or curved), and protrude anteriorly from the surface of the frontoclypeus (Funk et al. 2008)
  • Femora with dense row of long, fine setae on posterior margin (McCafferty et al 2017)
Couplet 11
Leads to Drunella tuberculata:
  • Has a row of long, hairlike setae along the margin of the clypeus
  • More robust, less flattened general appearance
  • Almost always has a pair of prominent, paired, stout, suboccipital spines
Leads to Drunella walkeri:
  • Lacks a row of long, hairlike setae on the clypeus
  • Usually a very flattened general appearance
  • Sometimes has only small bumps, other times more prominent suboccipital spines
Leads to Drunella allegheniensis:
  • Larvae have short, marginal, hairlike setae on the heads, legs, and tergites
  • No long setae protruding dorsally from tergites 8 and 9
  • Relatively many denticles on tarsal claws, and positioned along the length of the claw
Leads to Couplet 9:
  • Marginal setae not well developed on the heads, legs, and tergites
  • Long setae protrude dorsally from the anterior margins of tergites 8 and 9
  • Relatively few denticles on tarsal claws, positioned basally
Couplet 9
Leads to Drunella longicornis:
  • Foretibial projections long and distinctly curved
  • Relatively uncommon; species status not 100 % certain
Leads to Couplet 12:
  • Foretibial projections not developed as above
  • Relatively widespread and common
Couplet 12
Leads to Drunella cornuta:
  • Mature nymph 7.8-11.4 mm long (Funk et al. 2008)
  • Median ocellar tubercle sharp and relatively long (red box)
  • Lateral frontoclypeal projections usually semilunar (green boxes above)
  • Middle and hind tibiae relatively long (Funk et al. 2008)
Leads to Drunella cornutella:
  • Mature nymph 6.4-8.5 mm long (Funk et al. 2008)
  • Median ocellar tubercle blunt to moderately sharp and relatively short
  • Lateral frontoclypeal projections moderately curved to straight
  • Middle and hind tibiae relatively short (Funk et al. 2008)

Start a Discussion of this Couplet

References

Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 (email Jason). privacy policy