Header image
Enter a name
Lateral view of a Female Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeridae) (Hex) Mayfly Dun from the Namekagon River in Wisconsin
Hex Mayflies
Hexagenia limbata

The famous nocturnal Hex hatch of the Midwest (and a few other lucky locations) stirs to the surface mythically large brown trout that only touch streamers for the rest of the year.

Dorsal view of a Sweltsa (Chloroperlidae) (Sallfly) Stonefly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
This species was fairly abundant in a February sample of the upper Yakima.
27" brown trout, my largest ever. It was the sub-dominant fish in its pool. After this, I hooked the bigger one, but I couldn't land it.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or support the project for an enhanced experience here.

Baetis tricaudatus (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph Pictures

A nymph of the same species as this one emerged into a dun in my studio so I got photos of both stages.

NOTE: I missed an important key characteristic the first time I tried to identify this one (robust setae on the abdominal sternites, which were harder to see than I expected but are clearly present), so I went on a bit of a wild goose chase and landed at a dead end. After spotting that characteristic, this one keys more straightforwardly to either Baetis tricaudatus or the Baetis piscatoris complex. It doesn't seem to be a perfect fit for either one in the key, but I'm going with tricaudatus based on range and abundance. It's not certain.

However, I'm leaving the flawed analysis below with this disclaimer, because some aspects of how I approached that dead end might be informative in the future.

----Incorrect analysis below----

After spending a lot of time with this one under my shiny new microscope, I'm still not quite sure what it is. I botched my attempt to expose the mouth parts that might make the ID more definitive. Based on the key in Webb et al 2018's "Baetis Larvae of North America," here's my reasoning at each key couplet.

Couplet 1. The pronotum lacks dark, submedian U-shaped markings. Also, if I were to follow through to couplet 2, there seem to be characteristics that rule out each of the options: the intercalaris complex is ruled out by the abdominal markings, and the caudal filaments have neither a dark median band (ruling out the flavistriga complex) nor uniform pale coloration (ruling out Baetis notos). This sends me with decent confidence to couplet 4.

Couplet 4. I cannot find robust setae in my microscope on the scapes, pedicels, paraprocts, or sterna. I also do not see a pair of dark, bilobed markings on the pronotum. Unless I overlooked these characteristics, proceed to couplet 9.

Couplet 9. Abdominal tergum 5 is a bit paler than adjacent terga, but "distinctly paler"? The figure for Baetis alius in the paper, as well as a very nice picture posted by Millcreek in the forum here, shows that Baetis alius would have darker tergites surrounding #5. So proceed to couplet 11.

Couplet 11. The length of the gills is obviously less than 2X their width. This leads to the Baetis vernus complex, which could include that species or Baetis brunneicolor. This key doesn't say how to tell those species apart.

Switching over to Burien et al 2018 as the source, the characteristics used to distinguish vernus from brunneicolor seem to rule out either one. Brunneicolor should have more uniformly brown abdominal tergites, whereas vernus should have a lack of visible tracheation in most of the gills.

The fore femur length is about 3.8x its width.

Also worth noting: In the genus ID, I thought I could see the villipore in my microscope, but I'm not sure. If I back out of Baetis altogether and assume there's no villipore, I end up at Fallceon, but this specimen doesn't seem to have the frontal keel on the head that's supposed to be present on Fallceon quilleri. So that seems like a dead end as well.

Dorsal view of a Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Ventral view of a Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Ruler view of a Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington The smallest ruler marks are 1 mm.
Foreclaw.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Foreleg.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Setae on one of the gills.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Hind wing pads visible here.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
I think the villipore is visible here as a raised area toward the base of the femur on this detached leg, on the side opposite the large setae.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
A closeup look at this one shows robust setae along the posterior margin of the 10th tergite. They're a little more clear under the scope than in the picture, but you can see them as short little spikes in the circled area (and a few elsewhere on that margin). I missed these the first time I tried to key this one out, because I didn't realize how subtle and difficult they can be to see.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Another gill close-up. I think these are fine and not robust setae?

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Mandible closeup.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington
Another mandible closeup.

Baetis tricaudatus (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph from the Yakima River in Washington

This mayfly was collected from the Yakima River in Washington on September 12th, 2020 and added to Troutnut.com by Troutnut on September 19th, 2020.

Discussions of this Nymph

Puzzled on this Baetis nymph ID
2 replies
Posted by Troutnut on Nov 10, 2020
Last reply on Nov 12, 2020 by Troutnut
I just added several microscope photos to this specimen and placed in the description my thoughts as I tried to key it out, but I ran into a dead end. Anyone have new insights?

Start a Discussion of Nymph

Baetis tricaudatus (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Nymph Pictures

Collection details
Location: Yakima River, Washington
Date: September 12th, 2020
Added to site: September 19th, 2020
Author: Troutnut
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 (email Jason). privacy policy