Header image
Enter a name
Lateral view of a Female Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeridae) (Hex) Mayfly Dun from the Namekagon River in Wisconsin
Hex Mayflies
Hexagenia limbata

The famous nocturnal Hex hatch of the Midwest (and a few other lucky locations) stirs to the surface mythically large brown trout that only touch streamers for the rest of the year.

Dorsal view of a Pycnopsyche guttifera (Limnephilidae) (Great Autumn Brown Sedge) Caddisfly Larva from the Yakima River in Washington
This specimen appears to be of the same species as this one collected in the same spot two months earlier. The identification of both is tentative. This one suffered some physical damage before being photographed, too, so the colors aren't totally natural. I was mostly photographing it to test out some new camera setting idea, which worked really well for a couple of closeups.
27" brown trout, my largest ever. It was the sub-dominant fish in its pool. After this, I hooked the bigger one, but I couldn't land it.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or support the project for an enhanced experience here.

Caddisfly Species Oecetis disjuncta (Long Horn Sedges)

Where & when

Time of year : Peaks in late June

In 33 records from GBIF, adults of this species have mostly been collected during June (42%), July (33%), August (12%), and May (9%).

In 45 records from GBIF, this species has been collected at elevations ranging from 943 to 9318 ft, with an average (median) of 5876 ft.

Species Range

Identification

Source: Review and redescription of species in the Oecetis avara group, with the description of 15 new species (Trichoptera, Leptoceridae)

Diagnosis. This species differs from the form that has most often been attributed to it, here described as a new species, Oecetis sordida. The 2 are very similar and it is not surprising that Smith and Lehmkuhl (1980) came to the conclusion that the specimens they had examined from Saskatchewan represented this species after examining the holotype. They did note, however, the variation in the length of the preanal appendages, one useful diagnostic character for distinguishing the species. We have examined only a few specimens from California and Oregon that correspond to the holotype of Oecetis disjuncta, probably primarily due to the paucity of material from this region in the collections surveyed. Nevertheless, the character differences from Oecetis sordida seem to be consistent. It is true that the genitalia in these 2 forms are very similar, with the dorsal and ventral lobes of the inferior appendage merely " notched ", rather than with the ventral lobe distinctly projecting, and with the ventral margin of the phallobase strongly deflexed, and also with an asymmetrical phallic sclerite absent. However, the holotype of Oecetis disjuncta, which was described from California, is much lighter in color (a uniform pale yellowish-brown) than any specimens of Oecetis sordida (dark brown with a distinctly pigmented chord), is somewhat smaller in size, and has the preanal appendages distinctly more elongate. Additionally, Oecetis disjuncta lacks the distinctive rugose ventral apex of the phallobase that seems to consistently occur in Oecetis sordida. Oecetis sordida is nearly invariant in coloration and morphology throughout its very extensive range (southern Mexico and throughout the western United States, apparently as far east as Michigan). Despite the very limited material examined for Oecetis disjuncta, its separate species status is suggested by the distinct COI barcode difference of a specimen from Oregon identified as Oecetis disjuncta, as compared to Oecetis sordida and Oecetis avara (Fig. 58). Our decision to restrict the definition of Oecetis disjuncta to only those forms exactly resembling the holotype was made to stabilize the nomenclature of the taxon and to prevent its confusion with the form described here as Oecetis sordida. It should be pointed out that Oecetis disjuncta also closely resembles Oecetis apache sp. n., in the general structure of the genitalia, coloration, and lack of forewing pigmentation. The latter species differs in having the apex of phallobase distinctly V-shaped in caudal view (i. e., its ventral apex is strongly " keeled, " rather than U-shaped), and is also larger and has slightly broader forewings.


Start a Discussion of Oecetis disjuncta

References

  • LaFontaine, Gary. 1981. Caddisflies. The Lyons Press.

Caddisfly Species Oecetis disjuncta (Long Horn Sedges)

Taxonomy
Species Range
Common Name
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 (email Jason). privacy policy