Header image
Enter a name
Lateral view of a Male Baetis (Baetidae) (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly Dun from Mystery Creek #43 in New York
Blue-winged Olives
Baetis

Tiny Baetis mayflies are perhaps the most commonly encountered and imitated by anglers on all American trout streams due to their great abundance, widespread distribution, and trout-friendly emergence habits.

Dorsal view of a Holocentropus (Polycentropodidae) Caddisfly Larva from the Yakima River in Washington
This one seems to tentatively key to Holocentropus, although I can't make out the anal spines in Couplet 7 of the Key to Genera of Polycentropodidae Larvae nor the dark bands in Couplet 4 of the Key to Genera of Polycentropodidae Larvae, making me wonder if I went wrong somewhere in keying it out. I don't see where that could have happened, though. It might also be that it's a very immature larva and doesn't possess all the identifying characteristics in the key yet. If Holocentropus is correct, then Holocentropus flavus and Holocentropus interruptus are the two likely possibilities based on range, but I was not able to find a description of their larvae.
27" brown trout, my largest ever. It was the sub-dominant fish in its pool. After this, I hooked the bigger one, but I couldn't land it.
Troutnut is a project started in 2003 by salmonid ecologist Jason "Troutnut" Neuswanger to help anglers and fly tyers unabashedly embrace the entomological side of the sport. Learn more about Troutnut or support the project for an enhanced experience here.

Caddisfly Species Palaeagapetus celsus (Microcaddisflies)

Where & when

In 10 records from GBIF, adults of this species have been collected during June (50%), August (20%), July (10%), May (10%), and September (10%).

In 24 records from GBIF, this species has been collected at elevations ranging from 299 to 5303 ft, with an average (median) of 1919 ft.

Species Range

Physical description

Most physical descriptions on Troutnut are direct or slightly edited quotes from the original scientific sources describing or updating the species, although there may be errors in copying them to this website. Such descriptions aren't always definitive, because species often turn out to be more variable than the original describers observed. In some cases, only a single specimen was described! However, they are useful starting points.

Source: The genus Palaeagapetus Ulmer (Trichoptera, Hydroptilidae, Ptilocolepinae) in North America

Wings (A). Length of each forewing and hind wing 3.4 mm and 3.0 mm in male (3.1 – 3.6 mm, 2.6 – 3.2 mm, n = 6); 3.4 mm and 2.9 mm in female (3.0 – 3.6 mm and 2.7 – 3.0 mm, n = 9). Color and venation as in Palaeagapetus nearcticus. Lateral bulges of sternum V (7 B, F) round. Ventral process developed on segment VII in male (7 B) and segment VI of female (7 F). Male genitalia (Figs. 7 C – E). Segment IX (IX) short, anterolateral margins long, strongly projecting to anterior of segment VIII. Lateral appendages (la ap) of segment IX developed from mid-lateral region of genital capsule and directed caudad; thick and bilobed into dorsal and ventral branches at basal 1/3; dorsal branches (db) gently curved and tapered apically, each with slender process (sp) at basal 1/3 of mesal surface and many thick setae at apical half of dorsal surface, slender process directed mesocaudad with seta apically; ventral branches (vb) emerging near ventral bases of dorsal branches, directed ventrocaudad, each with 3 thick setae apically. Tergite X (tX) depressed dorsoventrally, curved dorsad apically in lateral view (7 C), semicircular in dorsal view (7 D). Inferior appendages (ia) each thick, short, twice as long as basal width, tapered at apical half with seta apically. Phallus (ph) short and broad, membranous with small forklike structure inside (7 C, E).

Female genitalia (Figs. 7 F, G). Segments I – VII each with sclerotized tergite and sternite, very setose, tergite VIII unpigmented. Segments IX – X very short, each segment about 1/2 as long as segment VIII, with somewhat developed cerci. Vaginal apparatus (7 G) slender, lateral projections undeveloped, lateral bands round.

Living Larvae. While examining live larvae under the microscope, JSW observed that the lateral processes of abdominal segments I – VIII do not resemble truncated fleshly tubercles of dead specimens as described by Flint (1962), but are actually much larger, membranous spheres. JSW also observed when a larva was prodded, to force it to exit its case, that the individual would sometimes turn 180 ° while staying completely inside its case. Then its head and thorax would emerge from the other end of its case and the larva would proceed to crawl away in the opposite direction (in respect to its previous position). The larva had the ability to use either end of its case as an opening for its head and thoracic legs, and the two ends of the case seemed to be rather similar in structure and function, similar in these ways to the larval behavior and case structure of distantly related Glossosoma spp. (Glossosomatidae) and Setodes spp. (Leptoceridae) (Wiggins 1996).


Start a Discussion of Palaeagapetus celsus

Caddisfly Species Palaeagapetus celsus (Microcaddisflies)

Taxonomy
Species Range
Common Name
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 (email Jason). privacy policy